• On MovieTome: CAPTAIN AMERICA was in THE HULK?!?
December 2, 2008 11:22 AM PST

Ning puts the handcuffs on porno networks

Posted by Caroline McCarthy
  • Font size
  • Print

There's no more room for smut and naughty bits on build-your-own social network service Ning, according to a post on the company blog. Ning has announced that it will shut down its "Red Light District" of adult content, and on January 1 will formally ban it.

"We are exploring ways for adult networks that will no longer be available on Ning to export their content in addition to their members," the post by CEO Gina Bianchini read. The reasoning, she explained, is that it's costly and problematic--something you just can't deal with in a recession.

Advertisers don't like it, Bianchini said. "Our ad partners aren't big fans of the adult networks and therefore require us to identify adult networks or risk our healthy advertising revenue," she explained. "We don't want to be in the policing business and, unchecked, that's where this is heading."

And if legal adult-content networks are allowed, the illegal ones invariably weasel their way in, Bianchini said, and that means more work for a small team. The number of Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices is also higher for adult networks: "Compared to our other social networks on the Ning Platform, the additional work created by adult networks alleged to have violated the copyrights of others is enough for us to discontinue adult networks in favor of investing time and energy in growing the Ning Platform from here," Bianchini wrote.

Ning isn't the only site to be cracking the whip on porn. YouTube, owned by Google, said on Tuesday that it's "tightening the standard for what is considered 'sexually suggestive.'"

Bianchini co-founded Ning with Netscape founder Marc Andreessen, and famously raised a $60 million round of funding in anticipation of a "nuclear winter." Guess that was a good move.

Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline.
Recent posts from The Social
At CES, MySpace chats up the Widget Channel
Current Media: Nope, we're not closing an office
Zuckerberg: New year, 150 million Facebook users
Model sues Google over mean, nasty blog remarks
Hackers hit MacRumors keynote coverage
LiveJournal deletes 'about a dozen' jobs
Update: Twitter blames celebrity hack on 'individual'
Oops! Twitter hack snares CNN anchor
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 10 comments
by t424unow December 2, 2008 1:39 PM PST
What does "sexually suggestive" mean? Are they going to do focus groups with participants wearing sensors that would detect increased blood flow to and/or moisture in the genitals while watching videos to determine this??

Catherine Zeta Jones is considered by many men to be "sexually suggestive" even while fully clothed -- are they going to ban her video images?
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis December 2, 2008 2:46 PM PST
Yeah, that's why things like this make me seriously ENRAGED at these people.... it seems that things like this are not about 'policing adult social networks and the problems that go along with that', but are more about marginalizing people who like pornography.
by mangoman7 December 2, 2008 2:19 PM PST
Although I understand Ning's dismay at the [heavy] volume of administrative work the maintenance of adult networks requires, your approach seems lame from a business point of view.

According to partner-investor Mark Andreesen's blog justification of adult networks on Ning last January - http://blog.pmarca.com/2008/01/porn-ning-and-t.html - Ning was going to balance those needs with others. Indeed, i was happy to see Ning grow to become such a feature-rich, content-creation-enabling environment not only for adult networks but for all communities.

Now, however, that position is not being furthered and is being quickly reversed because "it no longer makes sense."

Gina and Mark: you are failing to use market/economic principles to resolve your cited problems with adult networks. Let's review your arguments....

"Adult social networks don?t pull their own weight." So price those costs accordingly.

"By having legal adult social networks on Ning, we?ve seen a rise in volume of illegal adult social networks." Filter all new adult networks - put all adult networks on watch for 90 days, with explicit guidelines for responsible operation.

"Adult social networks on Ning receive a disproportionate number of DMCA take down notices creating additional work for our team." Push this "cost" of doing business onto the network owner, who becomes responsible for policing his/her community: screening/approving videos, verifying copyright authorization, etc.

These are just initial proposals; many viable, profitable alternatives exist. The point I want to emphasize is that there are additional steps that Ning can take to moderate its adult communities while enabling freedom and business opportunities that Ning purports to empower. The evidence contradicts Ning's own founders aspirations - and that seems to communicate Ning's own MO as SOB.

In our particular case, I was planning to build out an adult network which would provide our non-profit organization a viable platform to reach gay & bisexual men, and then extend the Ning platform with web interventions: online counseling, professionally-moderated chats, peer discussions, and live medical advice. Because adult/porn content offers a viable way to attract & retain this audience, now our ambition to educate as well as entertain has been seriously impeded - we're back to square one: how to affordably achieve our plans.

Practical decision is hardly what you've made; it's always a philosophical one. The problem is that your philosophy has shifted, and is a sad precedent that you couldn't innovate and create a win-win solution. Instead, you've demonstrated that any future, sudden and capricious change Ning may decide to make won't be in the network creator's best interest.
Reply to this comment
by gbswales1 December 2, 2008 3:13 PM PST
It is the defninition of an "adult network" that bothers me - i work for a university and we were trying to create a secure and safe forum - free of pornography and he like, for our Gay Lesbian and Transgender staff. We were to have a strict policy of no adult content to make it a safe environment that staff could also share with their families. We needed a private space outside of university websites because unfortunately many gay an lesbian people still feel vunerable. Ning provided the only site I know of where it could be totally private to the group and invitation only - something that you cant fully achieve on the likes of facebook.

I think the very least that Ning could do is to issue some kind of stand alone open source alternatives that we could use on external hosting not associated with the Ning network - or maybe this "social network" is just another business out to make a fast buck

Does anyone know of more liberally minded social networking sites that are - free, offer privacy, allow for a serious LGBT group and keep out commercial pornography - surely someone somewhere has the ability, courage and skill to start something like this.

I feel so bitterly frustrated at the inability of ordinary people to be able to influence the way companies behave - what is the use of freedom of speech if you have no where to speak
Reply to this comment
by FreeLottoPlayer December 2, 2008 8:33 PM PST
Caroline my comment on your article is "thank you" it was very clear, and factual. To my fellow commenters. This should not be an issue. The company has every right to decide what content it allows on its service. Other services that are adult friendly exsist and users will simply migrate to those services. If you do not find one that suits you, start your own and run it any way you like.

Just my two cents.
Reply to this comment
by alicebee123 December 2, 2008 11:04 PM PST
I have a site on Ning that deals with adult lifestyles and education and I have paid Ning each month to host my site from the moment that I created my site. They did not stop from taking my money this month.

They have all of my content and data and block us from getting our code. Were talking about thousands of members submitted photos, videos, blogs, forums, member pages and comments and so much more. We have worked long hours to bring out honest truth about different types of adult lifestyles. We were there for ning when they started and now we are getting a bad rap. Its the adult web sites on Ning that kept it going now that they raised Million of dollars they are trying to clean up their act.

Gina from Ning give us a wonderful Xmas present ... We have no site any more and no where to go. Not all adults site on Ning are porn but were all going ... what will we start burning books again?
This is what Ning sent back to me when I asked about my content. You tell me if you think this is fair 30 days to find a new home and will they give us back our content and how will we be able to integrate it on another sever? Ning was not free we paid to put our sites there and they welcome all of our adults sites with open arms and now what we got was 30 days and get out without any of our content.. Is this fair????

E-mail back from Ning
December 3, 2008
[The Ning Team - 12/02/2008 06:24 PM]

Regardless of the services you have purchased, if your network is of an adult
nature it will be removed on January 1st, 2009. If you'd like to keep your
network running on the Ning Platform, you're welcome to make changes so your
network no longer falls into our definition of adult network. This includes
removing any and all adult content from your network.
An adult network includes, but isn?t limited to:
? Pornography
? Depictions of sexual acts
? Sexually explicit or obscene themes

These changes take effect on January 1, 2009, so you'll need to make these
changes before then.

Please let us know if you have any further questions.

Best,
The Ning Team
Reply to this comment
by fitOlderMen December 3, 2008 8:09 AM PST
<p>This is what Ning writes in their TOS</p>
<p><i>"Subject to this Agreement, as a Network Creator, you control your Social Network and own all of Your Code and Your Content."</i></p>
<p>via <a href="http://about.ning.com/tos.php">Ning: About: Terms of Service</a></p>
<p>The problem is that Ning has changed their APIs. There is no way to get "your content" out of the Ning system anymore. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/22/ning-shuts-down-premium-developer-widgetlaboratory/">External developers</a> who had solutions to do that have been removed from Ning. Right now network creators only can export member data via an CVS export. Content like videos and photos are stuck in the system for the time being.</p>
<p>Ning is suggesting in this blog post</p>
<p><i>"As part of this transition, we are exploring ways for adult networks that will no longer be available on Ning to export their content in addition to their members, which is <a href="http://help.ning.com/cgi-bin/ning.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=3023&amp;p_created=1215721667&amp;p_sid=R*dgZjkj&amp;p_accessibility=0&amp;p_redirect=&amp;p_lva=&amp;p_sp=cF9zcmNoPTEmcF9zb3J0X2J5PSZwX2dyaWRzb3J0PSZwX3Jvd19jbnQ9NDA1LDQwNSZwX3Byb2RzPSZwX2NhdHM9JnBfcHY9JnBfY3Y9JnBfcGFnZT0xJnBfc2VhcmNoX3RleHQ9ZXhwb3J0aW5nIG1lbWJlcnM*&amp;p_li=&amp;search_method=">readily available today</a> from the Manage Members page. As we make progress on the specifics, we?ll communicate them in the <a href="http://help.ning.com/">Ning Help Center</a>."</i></p>
<p>Hopefully this problem will be solved bevore January 1st 2009. Otherwise adult network creators have "owned" content but never got a chance to "get" it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fitoldermen.com" target="_blank">fom</a> - fit older men</p>
Reply to this comment
by dctechguy December 3, 2008 8:42 AM PST
Ning's new policy is a classic example of a company caving into pressures (real or anticipated) that could affect their ability to raise capital or that requires intelligent sales and marketing communications with revenue sources. To say that advertisers object to adult sites is ridiculous. Certainly Ning does not randomly distribute ads across its networks. I am a member of an "adult oriented" site that uses Ning, and the ads certainly do not come from Proctor and Gamble or Kellogg. They are appropriate for the site and audience.

More likely, as sexist as it may sound, Ning's female CEO is uncomfortable when dealing with adult oriented sites. After all, many feel adult sites perpetuate the objectification of women, open the door for child pornography etc. Ning simply does not want to build in the review/safeguards required to screen out illegal activity. Instead, they are taking the easy road through censorship, rather than upholding the American tradition of Freedom of Speech.

Even the Supreme Court has not defined what is considered obscene. Apparently, Ning's management team has greater insight than the US Supreme Court.

This is classic big telecommunications company policy. Having worked for a leading telco and a web hosting service where adult content was ultimately prohibited, I have witnessed how big business interests will ignore fundamental personal freedoms to maintain their image of wholesomeness. After all, it makes lobbying the FCC and Congress so much easier.

Obviously the fundamentalist religious groups have continued to have their influence on what we can say, hear, and do in this country.
Reply to this comment
by dantynan December 3, 2008 10:09 AM PST
this is a money thing, pure and simple. mainstream ads will bring in bigger bucks, but only if the naughty stuff is nixed.

of course, youtube and ning built their initial audiences thanks to the naughty stuff. see my blog, "today's internet is brought you by porn" for more on what this really means.

http://blogs.computerworld.com/youtube_porn

cheers,

dt
Reply to this comment
by luis_carbajo December 3, 2008 2:54 PM PST
rSitez (http://www.rsitez.com) is one of the leading white label social networking platform and a competitor to Ning. Because of this we have received a number of questions regarding Ning?s action to shut down its ?Red Light District? of adult sites. Questions have been mainly regarding our position on this topic. We have a different approach. Therefore, the following is where we stand on the subject. Check our blog

http://socialshakers.com/2008/12/03/ning-shut-down-adult-networks-sites-search-for-new-home/

Thanks
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Apple: DRM-free tunes, unibody MacBook Pro

roundup At Macworld, Phil Schiller touts 10 million songs sans DRM, plus 69-cent songs, a unibody 17-inch notebook, iLife updates, and more.


Countdown to CES

special coverage The tech community descends on Las Vegas as the Consumer Electronics Show gets ready to kick off in all its gadgety glory.


About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right